F.6 · Ethics

Public statements and professional scope

Compare public statements with the RBT’s actual credential, supervised responsibilities and available evidence. Examples show how to keep outcome claims within the measured skill and setting while checking privacy and publication permission separately.

Task F.6: Comply with requirements for public statements about professional activities

Useful foundations: F.1: Core principles of RBT ethics

The rule

Make public claims match your actual credential, role and evidence, while keeping identifying client information out of public material.

Before posting or speaking publicly, separate what you are qualified to say from what requires supervisor or organizational approval. A professional-sounding claim can still mislead.

Key terms
Scope
The responsibilities and services supported by one’s actual role, qualifications and authority.

What to look for

DistinctionLook forHow to decide
Truthful scopeActual credential and supervised responsibilitiesDescribe the RBT’s supervised role accurately.
Public privacyNo identifying client informationCheck for identifying details in the description, images and context.
Outcome claimsEvidence supports the statementState outcomes within the available evidence and your professional role.

Worked examples

Credentials and scope

Describe the role accurately

An RBT drafts a profile saying, “I independently diagnose behavior problems and design treatment.” Their actual role is implementing supervisor-designed behavior-analytic services as an RBT.

Relevant facts

  • The draft claims responsibilities beyond the actual role.
  • The credential describes a supervised behavior-technician role.

Revise the profile to describe the real supervised role.

“Registered Behavior Technician providing services under qualified supervision.”

Describe your own credential, role and supervision accurately so readers understand the service you provide.

A plausible claim that overreaches

From one setting to every setting

An organization-approved public summary uses nonidentifying aggregate information: a group’s independent requests increased during observed clinic sessions. An RBT drafts, “Participants became more independent at home and in the community.” Neither home nor community performance was measured.

Relevant facts

  • The clinic result is supported by the described records.
  • The draft extends it to settings not observed.

Limit the statement to the measured clinic outcome.

Clinic observations → outcome claim scoped to the measured clinic performance

Limit the outcome statement to the skill and setting actually measured. Check privacy requirements and publication permission separately.

What changes the answer?

Keep the same approved aggregate clinic data.

  • No home or community outcome was measured.

Describe increased independent requests in observed clinic sessions.

Supported by the stated evidence.

The population, response and setting stay within the report.

Describe increased independence across daily settings.

Unsupported extension.

Use a summary that matches the measured skill and settings.

Match the claim’s scope to what was actually measured.

Remember

  • State the role you hold and the evidence you have.
  • Keep client identities out of public examples.
Sources for this topic

Reviewed 2026-09-30 · F.6 version 3.