Social consequences
The same call can have different outcomes
In one observation, a learner calls “Hey!” and an adult turns to chat. In another, “Hey!” is followed by the adult returning a tablet. In a third, it is followed by a pause in a difficult task.
Relevant facts
- The spoken response looks the same.
- The following events are interaction, item access and task removal.
These events suggest different hypotheses: attention, tangible access and escape.
Same response form → different possible maintaining consequences
Record repeated patterns and relevant context for the supervisor to assess the maintaining relation.
A response-produced effect
The sound comes from the action
In a hypothetical learning demonstration, a person repeatedly rolls a ridged wheel with a fingertip. Rolling directly produces a soft clicking sound. A controlled assessment has established that this response-produced sound maintains the rolling; no other person delivers the sound.
Relevant facts
- Rolling itself produces the maintaining effect.
- The scenario supplies an established functional conclusion from assessment.
This illustrates automatic reinforcement: the response directly produces its reinforcing effect.
Wheel rolling → clicking sound produced by rolling itself
Here, rolling directly produces the sound that assessment has established as the reinforcer. When an adult turns on music after a request, another person delivers the consequence. In either arrangement, evidence that the consequence maintains responding establishes its reinforcing function.